1723 Monitor vs 1723 S Tower
I have been playing around with the idea of upgrading my speakers for a little while. Currently running Definitive Tech 9040 fronts, 9060 center channel, and Martin Logan Motion 15 as surround. No sub, both towers were actually set to large until a couple weeks ago when one of my amps blew. Now they are set to small and I have the 8” integrated sub running LFE.
I have done a lot of research and believe to have fallen on Arendal as my next speakers Everything I hear about them is great.
Originally I wanted the 1723 towers (and still do) but just feel it’s overkill for my apartment and I can always upgrade later.
Question: Would 1723 monitors or 1723 Tower s be a better option?
My thought process is I will need to buy a stand for the Monitors regardless, why not get the smaller towers since there is no need to buy a stand and I will be integrating a sub anyways. Then the other side of my is saying that I am already spending that much might as well run the 1723 large towers as full range since the price difference isnt huge.
Setup: Room is 12×13 with open floor plan to left of seating area. Receiver is Denon X4200. Will be buying Emotiva XPA-3 to power front stage. Keeping Martin Logan speakers as surround for a while and may even keep the 9060 center and slowly upgrade everything over time. 75% movie, 25% music
Clearly I am torn and I apologize if this has been asked already. I have seen many talks of 1723 tower vs monitor but not this specific question.